- In the journal, reviewing is carried out according to the double-blind system. Authors are prevented from being acquainted with reviewers and vice versa.
- Reviewer assignments are sent to experts who are directly associated with the article or study submitted.
- In interdisciplinary studies, reviewer assignments are sent to different reviewers in accordance with the fields in the content of the article, and thereby, an attempt is made to preserve objectivity.
- In the case of a difference of opinion in the reviews of the two main reviewers who are appointed, the manuscript is sent to a third substitute referee who will be appointed. The decision to publish the article or not is determined depending on the assessment of the third reviewer.
- Deficiencies in manuscripts should be clearly stated by the reviewers in the review forms, the reasons should be well defined, and clear feedback should be given to the authors.
- Reviewers’ criticisms and recommendations should be expressed in an appropriate style.
- Reviewers must carry out their reviews within the time given to them. If the deadline is not met, a new reviewer is appointed by the editorial board.
- Like the authors, the reviewers are obliged to warn the journal management when they notice a conflict of interest.
- For journal editors, the COPE Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors will be taken as the basis.
Make a Submission
Information
Block title
-
40
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
29
Keywords
Social Media Accounts
 |
 |
 |
Visitors
The journal is licensed under a Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
Journal Hosting, Support, and Customization by | OJSDergi.com
